District 36 Approves Maximum Levy of $35.8M

Winnetka Public School District 36 plans to start discussion on debt abatement or repayment options at the Jan. 15 meeting.

Winnetka Public Schools District 36 board members recently approved levying $35.8 million despite residents' request for a lower tax levy increase or not levying for a year to draw down the district’s healthy fund balance. 

The approved 2012 tax levy is a 5 percent increase over the 2011 extension of $34.1 million levy. 

Residents who spoke at the Dec. 4 meeting say the increase comes at a time when student enrollment is down and when the district has nearly a 100 percent reserve, meaning it has enough funds for the district to operate for a year without any new revenue. 

Resident: Tax Increase in D36 Higher than New Trier

“Since 1997 [the consumer price index] is up 38 percent. The taxes for District 36 are up 122 percent, that’s significantly higher than any taxing bodies in the area – higher than New Trier,” Winnetka resident Jim Wyant said at the meeting citing Village of Winnetka data. “Enrollment is declining yet staff rates are rising. … As a taxpayer. it’s hard for me to understand how you can ask for the maximum amount of increase in light of these facts.” 

School officials say if the district doesn’t levy the full amount, future tax revenues could be impacted. Historically, the district has levied the maximum amount, said Marcia Sutter with Winnetka Public Schools' Communications and Community Relations office. 

“If you don’t levy for that [maximum] amount this year, your base is lower next year and every year thereafter. So you are impacting not just what you collect this year but every year in the future and you never have the opportunity to go back and do it again,” Sutter said in a phone interview Friday. 

Board member Tom Shannon, who called into the Dec. 4 meeting, says he disagrees with the argument that if the district forgoes levying for a year, it’s given up on tax revenues in future years. 

The levy passed 5–0 with Susan Crowe, Jon Kaplan, Crow Whitcome, Beth Moritz Filip, William Meuer and Matthew Hulsizer voting yes. Board president Dana Crumley was absent and Shannon left the meeting before the vote. 

Want to stay up to date on school news? Let us make it easy by sending it directly to your inbox or Facebook page. Sign up for Winnetka-Glencoe Patch's newsletter or "like us" on Facebook.

D36 Cost Per Pupil Higher than Nearby Districts 

During the Dec. 4 meeting, Winnetka resident Connie Henry also asked board members why District 36 was spending more per pupil than nearby school districts. 

For the fiscal year 2010–2011, instructional expenditure per pupil was $11,035 in District 36; $8,248 in Wilmette School District 39; and $9,243 in Glencoe School District 35, according to data from Illinois Interactive Report Card

Sutter said the reason District 36’s cost per student is higher than nearby districts is because the district’s debt service is reflected. 

“In the past, the community has been extremely supportive of the schools and passed several referendums,” Sutter said. “The repayments of those bonds are reflected in our cost per student.” 

Some of the referendums were to raise funds to cover capital expenses for new buildings and maintenance on old buildings, Sutter said. 

“The way Illinois school funding works is typically after you pass a referendum you start to build up the reserves and then eventually you start to spend them down,” she said. “You try and maximize the amount of time between referendums. So clearly with the reserves we have now there’s no referendum anywhere on the horizon.” 

District 36 plans to start its discussion on debt abatement or repayment options at 4 p.m., Jan. 15, Sutter said. 

“There’s numerous issues that need to be addressed and discussed before [debt abatement or repayment] options could be presented,” Sutter said.

Hubbard Woods Parent December 18, 2012 at 09:01 PM
Let the insanity begin! Why is this flush with cash district raising taxes? And, right before a negotiation with the teacher's union on salaries? The cost per pupil are higher than those of our neighboring communities and the educational product and results are subpar. Where are those fiscally responsible republicans on whom we have depended for clear sighted management of precious resources? Is there no amount that is too much to spend on the schools? Does so much money buy a better education? I think we all know the answers here. We need the resources to match the needs of the district, not to swamp them.
Crow Island Parent December 20, 2012 at 05:12 PM
I don't understand why people think throwing more money at our schools will solve anything. The apathy of Winnetkans is the reason D36 has gotten away with providing a poor educational product, highlighted by the lack of accountability of our teachers. What is really being taught in our schools? The math curriculum is abysmal and non-existent in some classrooms, the world language program is a joke...making tacos doesn't teach you anything about Spanish...the list is never ending. Time spent on academics is minimal. The lack of consistency and quality instruction is incomprehensible. Given the demographics of this community, our ISAT scores should be significantly higher. Wake up Winnetka, your children are being underserved, but instead of demanding more from our schools, which has one of the highest costs per pupil (debt service is just another way of saying D36 is overspending), you hire tutors. What is it going to take for this town to finally demand the education we are already being overcharged for? The taxes paid to D36 are the real reason this town is no longer "affordable" to live in.
Jim Wyant December 24, 2012 at 06:37 PM
I completely disagree with Marcia Sutter's spin. While it is true that under the current tax cap laws, future levies are dependent upon past levy amounts, we could forego a levy increase for the next decade and still be overtaxing D36 residents. Just because it impacts future levy amounts, is not a reason to continue to overtax us. Click on the above link from Illinois Interactive report card. Connie Henry got it right. Our INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES are significantly higher than neighboring districts. Debt service is a completely different line item, which is just one reason why our overall expenditures per student are among the highest in the State. The reason our educational expenditures are so high is that the enrollment is plummeting and staff rates are rising. Also, our administrative costs are sky-high.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »