Tempers Flare as Winnetka Halts Affordable Housing Debate

Village trustees voted to shut the door on affordable housing for now.

Affordable housing, and the role of government, were on trial on Tuesday night.

At the end of a five-hour meeting, village trustees voted 4-3 to stop the affordable housing discussion in . Residents, workers and even , packed the room, with some spilling into the hallway and others sitting on the floor, through more than two hours of debate on a resolution to halt further discussions on affordable housing in a town without diverse housing stock.

"We are trying to end the divisiveness in this community," said Trustee Richard Kates, who drafted the resolution, before public comments began. According to Village Attorney Katherine Janega, future councils must draft legislation in order to discuss affordable housing in the future.

At the November meeting, trustees took a straw poll and said they would heed the results of this year's Winnetka Council Caucus poll, which suggested that most people who took the survey do not want to pursue affordable housing. About 25 percent of Winnetka households took the survey, according to the Caucus website.

In the name of civil rights

Resident Marc Hecht was one of 11 to speak against the resolution. "Sometimes legislators are dutybound to lead even if it is not popular," he said, referencing the Caucus results.

Hecht also called the resolution comparable to "taking a stick and poking it in the eye of the Illinois Attorney General, and daring her to sue Winnetka to enforce the State Affordable Housing Act. Picking a fight with the State of Illinois, on what will be seen as a traditional civil rights issue, is just crazy."

Another speaker against the resolution was former trustee King Poor, who called the resolution "plain unnecessary and uncalled for."

"It will make Winnetka stand out for going out of its way to be hostile," Poor said.

Two members of the Plan Commission spoke against the resolution, as well as a former Caucus Village Committee Chair*, Jan Bawden. "I respectively submit that you don't get to quit," Bawden said. "It's not pretty, it is not convenient, but it is all our jobs."

Winnetka lost 37.5 percent of its renter-occupied units between 1980 and 2000, according to the Plan Commission.

In support of small government

Six people spoke in favor of the resolution to end affordable housing, including Carry Buck, who led the charge against affordable housing as chairwoman of Winnetka Home Owners Association (WHOA).

"Some things that were said tonight surprise me," Buck said. "Shouldn't the trustees represent the majority of the people?"

Others mentioned a desire to avoid "federal dollars" in Winnetka, and to keep "big government from reaching into our community."

The Dance of the Trustees

For about an hour, the trustees shared their views on the discussion and acknowledged some wear-and-tear. Trustee Jennifer Spinney said her feelings were hurt by some of the comments suggesting the council was not working on the issue. Trustee Gene Greable said he has been losing sleep. Trustee Christopher Rintz shared his personal story of moving into Winnetka as an outsider. "I never thought I'd see these people turn away from controversy," he said.

After everyone shared their opinions, it was time to vote.

Trustee William Johnson expressed hesitancy at voting, and began asking the village attorney for clarification on the lasting implications of the amendment.

"No council before this council has ever taken something off the table for future councils," said Village Attorney Katherine Janega. "No council really should do that, in my opinion."

When Kates spoke out against this, Janega fired back, "I do not mince my words or shape them according to some political outcome. I have 30 years of experience in this subject area. ... You may take whatever I say and disregard it, shape it, but please do not misrepresent my words."

As the exchange continued, Village President Jessica Tucker said, "You do not need to berate our village attorney." Later Trustee Arthur Braun suggested that Janega's words had changed the tone of the issue.

Two trustees put forth an amended resolution with a temporal distinction. The wording of the amended Section Two of the resolution reads: "Given the current condition of the economy, cost of land and lack of meaningful development opportunities in the village, it is the opinion of the council that the Amended Affordable Housing Plan adopted May 10, 2005 not be amended further at this time."

In the end, the trustee vote was split, with Tucker breaking the tie in favor of the amended resolution.*

The debate about diverse housing options in Winnetka is suspended.

"Like" us on Facebook; you can afford it. It's free!

* Dec. 8 11:30 a.m. Clarification: We added the word "amended" to make it clear that the 4-3 vote was on the amended resolution, not the original resolution provided by Trustee Kates. We changed Jan Bawden's title from Caucus chair to Caucus Village Committee Chair.

Winnetka resident March 24, 2013 at 07:10 PM
There are very few Winnetka residents who were in favor of Affordable Housing. It was stunning to see the woman--Becky, who led the Winnetka commission on consideration for Affordable Housing, and her husband stand at a meeting stating they would like one of these subsidized properties for their retirement or for their children who at this time cannot afford to buy a home in Winnetka. If through these redistributive policies she hopes to achieve her dream of a subsidized retirement house ...it would be more honest to stand on a corner with a can and at least ask for our money rather than simply mandate it into our taxes through the Affordable Housing initiative. Further, as Chris Rintz makes his living from building subsidized Affordable Housing he should not be in a position to vote for or against Affordable Housing in Winnetka as he is not an unbiased bystander nor a fair and balanced advocate for Winnetka but rather for himself and for his business. That alone should keep him from running for the only board position that sets Winnetka's agenda. There are people that sat on the commission who invest and are invested in Affordable Housing projects. That should have barred them from vetting the Affordable Housing topic. I suggest future committees are more thoroughly investigated for those who have a personal agenda.
Winnetka resident March 24, 2013 at 07:13 PM
Taxes are already sky high. Those with a personal agenda who want to add to our already heavy tax burden and create dicussions to that end must be Winnetka residents. Because of the havoc and ill-will surrounding Affordable Housing the village discussion ignored many other topics concerning our village's future. We must concentrate future discussions on our budget, our schools, our employees and the general well being of Winnetka.
Winnetka resident March 24, 2013 at 07:13 PM
I wonder why Gail Schecter and her associate Brendan Saunders who are funded by HUD and DO NOT live in Winnetka are allowed to give voice to Affordable Housing in Winnetka Village Meetings at all. They have come into this village and attacked residents, like those from WHOA, in a most unseemly manner. It must stop. It is creating ill-will, divisiveness and dissension. They do not pay taxes. They do they live here and they should not be welcome into a Village Meeting nor should they be allowed to voice their agenda on behalf of their initiative to direct the policies and the taxes of a village they do not live in. Community Organizers and Alinskyites are now more clearly understood to create havoc, and are but a scheme to blackmail others for funds, as seen in the Community Reinvestment Act, the CRA, which nearly brought down the economy of the USA with their fraudulent Fannie and Freddie loans. Those NINJA (no income, no jobs, no assets) loans were given to those who could not and did not make their payments on their homes. It was a scheme and Schecter's plan is of the same order.
Lynn Sanders March 25, 2013 at 03:34 AM
Please stop verbally attacking Gail Schechter, Becky, Chris Rintz and Brendon Saunders, and everyone else who believes in affordable housing. It is immature and nasty to act so rudely. These are wonderful people, who don't deserve your diatribe. It is NOT true that very few people support affordable housing. I'm a Winnetka resident in support of affordable housing. And I know plenty of others who feel the same way. What IS true is that the majority of people in Winnetka have not voted. Only 27%. More people who opposed affordable housing made it to the polls. But that doesn't mean we have to stop our discussion of an important issue. Why shouldn't Winnetka have affordable housing? We need diversity and options for single families and seniors. Besides that, we need to be able to have discussions without resorting to mud-slinging. Life is short. If you don't agree with someone, that's fine. But please turn off the verbal abuse. Is that possible?
Antonia Duhe April 09, 2013 at 04:35 PM
They are scabs


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »