When we first moved to Winnetka, we rented. We wanted to "test the waters" and see if this was a community where we wanted to drop anchor. The overflow of welcoming neighbors and rush of school/park opportunities hooked us. But the (literal) flood in the basement was a clue that we'd be wise to check out "higher ground" if Winnetka was to become home.
This blog isn't begging for a debate about what Winnetka HH will pay what portion of the proposed $35? $40? now 75?!+ million that's been proposed for storm water "chunneling." This is a topic that might whip up even more of a tsunami.
When we did buy a house, we got a recurring fungus we didn't anticipate -- frequent, sometimes daily e-mails from the"Winnetka Home Owners* Association." (Why? When we were renters, were we not part of the true community?? Were we not residents on the radar? Our opinions didn't matter?)
At first, we were just puzzled. The name sounded so official and all-encompassing. And the confusing logos/pictures they brazenly used were so clearly the trademarked images that belong to -- and should only be used by -- official governing bodies (ex. Park District, Village Hall, Winnetka 36, etc). I wondered: How many residents are involved? Are there open meetings? Is it politically motivated?
After more e-mail barrages, I got peeved. What's with the obvious Tea Party slant? Why all the school board bashing? Why all of the dramatic, fear-mongering ALL CAPS headlines? Actual examples of "WHOA's" sooooper scariest subject lines:
- OMG!!! (then OMG - Part 2 & OMG - Part 3)
- ARE YOU FRIGHTENED?
- CAUCUS BOAT IS FLOUNDERING (although just a few days earlier the caucus had announced a slate "WHOA: favored and at that time "WHOA" dubbed that slate their DREAM TEAM!)
- WORST STORIES OF 2008, 2009, 2010
Finally, I got PO'd. This started last year, when the e-mails took a viciously dark turn. "WHOA" had actually created sites & links dedicated to bashing individuals I personally knew that live and/or work in town. Selective bits of certain Trustees' comments were posted with incredibly misleading headlines. E-mails from residents (mostly anonymous, but some with names attached that were scattercast WITHOUT the senders consent) were being circulated that denigrated neighbors by name and sometimes address. Anyone - resident or not - that dared express a viewpoint contrary to what "WHOA" promoted was apparently up for the local firing squad.
Still I sent several e-mails pointing out glaring inaccuracies and asking for a simple mission statement. No surprise - I got banished and berated. But my efforts did spark this e-mail response that answered some, but not nearly all, of my questions:
WHO IS WHOA? (from their e-blast dated 2/8/11) The Winnetka Home Owners* Association has evolved over more than twenty years. It is true we coalesced around a single issue - preservation and property rights......We started out with a huge Board - most of whom are still in town and still agree with us - well, most of the time. However, now, we have only five officers and no “official” membership. No dues. No monthly meetings....... There are about five hundred people who we communicate with regularly. Another 1,000 open our mail occasionally. It seems we are always asking for help.... Carry Buck - Chairman, Ann Dillon - Chief Editor, Jim Burke - Treasurer, Mary Joyce Robbins - Secretary, Tracy Yale - Chief of Research
It's true that they are always asking for help. The ~ 500 e-mail followers are perpetually goaded to join the Winnetka Caucus, stack meetings & vote!!! (all laudable civic duties, right?) But the subtext is: only if you agree with the "WHOA" candidate/stance. Sometimes "WHOA" asks for more than help, they flat-out beg for money - like when they gathered funds to publish a "newspaper" that promoted Trustee Spinney. That year, they raised enough funds that they had to formally register as a PAC. And then just as quickly they "un-PACed."
Currently, the direction of these ~500 (?) people appears to be aggressively PACish once again and focused on electing Gene Greable for Village President. Several e-mails featuring his bio & photo have been sent out by them in the last few weeks. Mr. Greable is Winnetka Caucus-slated. Yet it's unclear if Gene G. even wants to be "WHOA"-backed! At the last open caucus meeting, he adamantly distanced himself from them. And yet, since then, Mr. Greable is silently, seemingly willing to let "WHOA" cheerlead for him.
The other candidate in the bid for Village President is independent Chris Rintz. "WHOA" has already taken the negative campaign route and hurled barbs. They have taken swipes at Mr. Rintz and even the audacity of him choosing to run an unaffiliated, self-funded candidacy.
I have two hopes:
1. Whatever happens on election day will be determined by the intelligent, free-thinking voters of Winnetka and will not be corrupted by conspiracy-theories, misstatesments and dead-horse** issues flung about by a non-official group of fiction writers that try (sometimes successfully, sometimes not) to flaunt power.
2. It's nearly springtime and Winnetka's ever popular "Trash Week" is coming up....maybe after two dozen years of nonsense "WHOA" can be booted to the curb..like that dangerous wooden crib circa 1975 and those crooked golf clubs.
QUESTION: Wilmette, Northfield, Kenilworth, do you have an unofficial "HA" that gets this involved with local politics and even the personal business of residents (yard signs, landmark status, etc.)?
- Jen McQuet
* Homeowner is a single, compound word. Thus -"WHOA" should be "WHA!"
** Their most popular scare tactic is to continually harp about the dangers of affordable housing (and those folks that come with it) coming anywhere close to Winnetka. Those of us in town that supported the modest moves to improve the rights of both homeowners and renters recently succeeded on two issues that put “WHOA” in an angry tailspin – coach home rentals and a downtown Property Maintenance Code. Then, the vote on affordable housing was negative. It’s now a closed subject with NOTHING in front of our Trustees or even on anyone w/ Winnetka power's radar….except for, of course, “WHOA.”
I think WHOA is harmful to the image of Winnetka and its citizens. The residents of Winnetka are much more generous, kind, fact based and forward thinking than what WHOA represents. WHOA always seem so angry about everything. Why is this group so angry? They are some of the most privileged and rich people in America. I do not understand where their angst and anger comes from. I had to unsubscribe because I felt their message was so intentionally negative.
I have since removed myself from the list, as I find almost everything Carry Buck has to say lacking in facts, logic, common sense or civility. Several people have told me that she reprints emails that were sent to other people as if they were sent directly to her; that she reprints without permission; and that she changes the wording to suit her needs. Unlike a real homeowners association, she only represents one side of any issue (the conservative side), and operates WHOA with a handful of her friends. I found her vitriol during the affordable housing conversations to be deplorable. She continued to spread misinformation no matter how many times she was corrected. I don't understand why people follow her or why they can't do their own research and come to their own conclusions.
And then of course we've got her son on the Village Council, too. No experience in governance, no volunteer experience in our community, but slated by a committee that she had packed with her friends and supporters for the very purpose of getting her own son elected. Really, you've got to hand it to her. She's never served on the Caucus Council but pretty much runs it. That we Winnetkans have tolerated this for as long as we have is just as pathetic as the maneuvering that's been taking place.
i'm so happy they make life simple.
It is easy enough not to get her e-mails any more -- just write back with an argument FOR whatever she's against that day. She'll never circulate anything that disagrees with the whoa worldview. And eventually, you'll get dropped.
JIMAND7 - REALLY? THE BEST THINK? HARDLY. I CAN THINK OF AT LEAST 1000
They should. That would be a way to pay for stormwater fixes.
Definition: A Homeowner's Association is comprised of two or more homeowners that belong to a mandatory membership organization for the maintenance of commonly owned real estate and improvements and regulations of privately owned property in a given area. New community developments are often required to form a nonprofit corporation charged with maintaining common areas within the development. They typically are responsible for managing community finances and their board’s direction, and enforcing the guidelines in their covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R). Collecting unpaid assessments, enforcing the association's governing documents, handling disputes and dealing with contractors. So, Winnetka's "homeowners association" has: - NO DOCUMENTS - NO BOARD - NO MEMBERSHIP - NO DUES - NO COMMONLY OWNED REAL ESTATE And they: - HAVE DONE NO IMPROVEMENTS - TRY TO ENFORCE GUIDELINES TO A MYSTERY CC&R Wow. I'd move. Who let's them get away with this?
Carolyn Buck 609 Sheridan Road 2009-01-21 $500 (WHOA) Jean Brainerd 910 Willow Rd. $200 (WHOA) Carolyn Buck $3,144 (WHOA) (WHOA) Jean Brainerd 2008-12-02 $200 (WHOA) Carolyn Buck 2008-11-18 $595 (WHOA) Carolyn Buck 2008-11-12 $85 (WHOA) William Redemann 2008-11-05 $10 (WHOA) Chadwick Prodromos, M.D. 2008-11-01 $75 (WHOA) Mary M. McMahon 2008-10-27 $100 (WHOA) Grace Young 2008-10-26 $100 (WHOA) Paul Crnkovich $250 (WHOA) Pigott Sheila $250
Winnetka really is beautiful. It's a shame these people want to prevent others from experiencing it.
Would love to hear a whoa response
I found there emails so offensive, inflammatory, and downright wrong that I took my name off their list. In my opinion they do not speak for many residents in this Village. Sully 9:36 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 Hey, Winnetka's own little mafia! Reply Leave a comment
the name they use seems to be the biggest problem. angry republicans will always get together and bang their chests. but that's their right too. they just shouldn't use such a grandiose title that implies that they are politically legit and speaking for all winnetka residents (those that OWN homes anyway). why don't they have a web site? if they want help and money, that would seem like a basic necessity for their efforts. does everything actually funnel through one person's e-mail? Sully 9:31 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 You answered yourself- they are angry republicans who use grandiose, yet extremely inaccurate, names in order to fool people who are not that familiar with the issue. Look at the names of some of the republican legislative acts or the names of certain political action groups. The opposite if what the name implies. You never want to miss out on the opportunity to mislead. (These comments were posted on a previously posted, re-edited version. But got left off the re-post).
Carry - I am appalled at the nasty comments the Patch prints after their incredibly biased (and equally nasty) editorials. Who are those people? Mary Lou Hi Mary Lou - We could put names to the remarks but we won't. Suffice to say they are Rintz supporters. - Carry Carry - I haven't written to WHOA before but the article/editorial written by Jen McQuet made me crazy. It is so insulting. Why does the Patch publish that trash? I see that recently most of the comments following the article have been deleted - probably because they were flagged as inappropriate. Terrible. In case Ms. McQuet is wondering...WHOA speaks for me. Thank you. KATHLEEN GAVIN Hi Cary, Did you see the most recent Patch.com article? What bunk. I like that WHOA speaks for me and informs me. Keep up the great work. CATHERINE LESTERHUIS