patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

3 Weeks Before Vote, Questions About Home Rule Remain (Part 1 of 6)

Home Rule in Northfield: An in-depth look in six parts into the history and effects of putting more power into Northfield leaders' hands.

 

This article is the first part of a six-piece series on the issue of home rule in Northfield, which will appear on the ballot Nov. 2.

When former Northfield Village President Donald Whiteman knocks on residents' doors and asks them if they're going to vote for home rule on Nov. 2, he said he generally gets one of three reactions:

"Yeah, I think I'm for it" (four in 10).
"I don't think I'm really for that" (one in 10).
"What is that?" (five in 10).

Whiteman belongs to a steering committee that is canvassing residents to support the ballot measure to bring more power to Northfield. Despite recent press and town hall meetings, many residents say they still don't know exactly what home rule is or how it would affect this village. At its core, home rule gives a village the ability to create any code or levy any tax that is not expressly prohibited in the Illinois Constitution or by directives from the state legislature. Put another way, non-home-ruled communities, like Northfield, can only do what is explicitly authorized by the state.

"Home rule gives this town the ability to do so much more for its residents in so many different ways," Whiteman said at a recent village-sponsored public forum on home rule. "Instead of being a minority all the time and getting dumped on by the state, it's time to go on the other side of the aisle and have more control over your life."

While he was board president, from 1997 to 2005, Whiteman said Northfield's relative economic health did not present a need for home rule in the village. But the debate began during John Birkinbine, Jr.'s term, 2005-2009.

As Birkinbine explained to residents in public letters in 2007, Northfield's cash reserves were decreasing, due to state-imposed but unfunded mandates; increased service costs; and a down-turning economy. Back then, two referenda to levy taxes to help pay for a broken water pipe and to cover salaries associated with Northfield's fire shift program were voted down. But, had Northfield been home-ruled, the tax levies would have been enforced without voter approval. At that point, the board began musing about trying to adopt home rule in the future.

And now that reserves are at the lowest the village has ever seen (board trustees have estimated all savings could be gone in six months), it's current Village President Fred Gougler's turn to try to introduce home rule to Northfield.

"Home rule will enhance our financial flexibility," Gougler recently told Winnetka-Glencoe Patch. "It will enable us to maintain our streets, our sewers and our sanitary systems – the basics."

The evidence of months and months of grueling study of home rule lies in Gougler's basement – on his pool table. Three giant binders stuffed with reports and analyses spell out two significant points the village board wants to make: 1) Northfield is running low on savings and 2) the best way to solve its financial gap is by becoming a home-ruled community.

At public meetings, several residents have met Gougler's home-rule talking points with skepticism, questioning why the town is in need of more money in the first place and wondering how far the six-person board of trustees and president will take its newfound taxing powers.

In a forthcoming series, Patch has scoured available studies on home rule in Illinois, taken a look at the village's finances, and spoken with officials in Northfield and neighboring towns to offer you a comprehensive look at what could happen if Northfield's trustees are given more power.

Part 1: A Brief Home Rule History
Part 2: The Power (and Limits) of Home Rule
Part 3: So How Bad Are Northfield's Finances?
Part 4: What Northfield Leader Are Proposing To Do With Home Rule
Part 5: Citizen Concerns

Related Topics: Fred Gougler
Should Northfield voters approve home rule on Nov. 2? Tell us in the comments.

Neil Hernandez

9:21 am on Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Before voters decide wheter HomeRule is right for Northfield or not, we the residents need to know more information. It seems to me the biggest issue is why is Northfield in such a large budget deficit. Northfield is in the mess because expenses are larger than revenue. Home rule gives more flexibility in the revenue portion (hint - raising taxes), but what about the expense portion of the budget. Expenses have to be analyzed before a sensible solution can be made.

I suspect expenses are so high due to labor costs. This means the salaries and benefits we are paying the Northfield public employees. How much are firefighters, policemen, administrative personnel paid? Are the benefits and pensions we pay exceed private sector market rates? What about the unfunded liabilities? This is all information, we Northfield residents must know so we can make the best decision.

- Neilski

Reply
Comment_arrow

e

10:04 am on Friday, October 22, 2010

I had the same concerns about the village's expenses. After attending many meetings, reading the financial statements and listening to the retired WinnetkaVillage Manager, Doug Williams, discuss Northfield's financial situation, I am convinced that our village is running a very tight ship and has reduced expenses as much a possible. Williams, who managed Winnetka's village budget for 18 years, offered an unbiased look @ Northfield's financials. Williams explained Northfield has cut staff down to a bare minimum and is one of the few municipalities in the area with all part-time firefighters. That means that Northfield pays no benefits or pension- a HUGE savings. This is just one example he gave. Unfortunately, state- mandated pensions have burned a hole in Northfield's "pocket." This is out of our control. Home Rule gives communities more flexibility and allows them to add small taxes to items that other villages are already taxing. A good example is the gas tax. Most surrounding villages with home rule are able to bring in income from those who pass through and buy gas. Personally, I never noticed the difference in price. If you have questions, there's a Home Rule Coffee with the board tomorrow, Sat., Oct. 23 @ the Village Hall from 9-11am. Also, look @ the Village of Northfield's website- there's an entire Home Rule section.

Barbara D. Wick

3:51 pm on Wednesday, October 13, 2010

I found quite a lot of information on www.northfieldil.org (then click on the box labeled Home Rule), which answered these valid questions for me and convinced me that the expense cutting (which includes labor costs) has gone as far as it can --- perhaps too far. I learned about pension requirements and the State mandates on funding the pensions, which the Village cannot control. And I learned about how thinly the staff is stretched.

Residents of Northfield expect a decent level of services such as sewer and water line maintenance and road repairs. We want prompt police, fire, and ambulance responses. These have price tags which we must support. I believe home rule will help us do that.

-- A concerned and long time resident of Northfield

Reply

Donald Whiteman

10:45 am on Thursday, October 14, 2010

I have been tracking the village's budgets and operation for years and I have never seen it overstaffed or run inefficiently. In fact, our village has done some unique things to keep expenses down. One of them is cross-training many of the public works staff to be fire fighters so it can basically get two employees for one. Northfield has one of the lowest expense per resident ratios in the area and it has already made significant cuts in recent years to budgets that were already quite lean and mean. Any additional cuts will directly affect the police and fire services that Northfield residents have indicated over and over that they want kept as a top priority.

Home Rule is much more than financials, however. It also includes the ability to have more local control over things that matter deeply to to Northfield residents through being able to enact local ordinances that it is not permitted to have under its Non-Home Rule status. An example of this is the abandoned, company owned BP station on Willow Road. Northfield required BP to clean up the site through an ordinance that had been on the books for years. BP went to court and the judge ruled in their favor citing that our Non-Home Rule status precluded us from enforcing such an ordinance.

Under Non-Home Rule, we are among the 20% of all Illinois municipalities and I do not want Springfield to dictate our future. I want our village board made up of local residents to do it.

Donald Whiteman
Former Village President

Reply

e

10:27 am on Friday, October 22, 2010

Those against Home Rule will argue that we can't trust the village board, composed of our fellow neighbors and friends, to keep property taxes under control. In fact, the village passed an ordinance requiring the board to limit property tax increases to those allowed by the current Property Tax Cap unless there's a "fiscal emergency," "a budgetary mandate from the Illinois legislature" or "a budgetary mandate from a court of competent jurisdiction." I trust locally-elected officials more than I trust down-state politicians!
The IL Realtors Association recently sent out a mailing suggesting that Home Rule would include a property transfer tax. This is incorrect- it is not on the current referendum and would require a separate vote.
I encourage my fellow residents to ask questions and become informed voters! And don't forget to vote!
Elizabeth Kochvar, concerned resident

Reply

Leave a comment